|
|
Welcome to Sky Science - Skydiving |
Can't see our menu? JavaScript Enabled? - (Click here) |
Welcome to Sky Science - Skydiving |
||
| |
||||
| How safe is Sport Parachuting / Skydiving
All those who choose to participate in the sport, therefore voluntarily
accept an element of risk. Here, our purpose is to provide you with the
information to reduce the risks and help you to make an informed choice. After searching the web sites, it has become apparent that some companies have been tempted to mislead potential customers with good sales and marketing tricks instead of truthful facts. Some web sites are absolutely amazing but full of lies so do beware. Remember this important point "words mean nothing unless backed up with proof", whether you book a course with Sky Science or someone else, here is an important check list to ensure you are getting a safe skydiving course. My pet hate is businesses and companies that lie and cheat to get customers and with the international system of web site designs there is nothing that anyone can do about it apart from try and educate new skydivers to what is really happening. When you start skydiving it’s important that you choose your drop zone, club, school and instructors carefully, and learn how to stay safe. And that’s the reason behind this survival guide. Instructors The only way to check whether instructors are as qualified and experienced as they say, is to check the certificates issued by the British Parachute Association or foreign governing bodies. Do not just accept there word for it Each country has very different systems, in the UK you need a minimum of 1,000 jumps and 10 hours in freefall before trying to qualify as an AFF Instructor, the course itself is extremely hard to pass and has a high failure rate so the quality of Instructors that do qualify is extremely high. In the USA you need a minimum of 400 jumps; the course is a teaching course and has a very high success rate, the quality of new instructors is very low, however last year they increased the pass mark to 75% instead of the old system of only 50%, so the standards are improving. The big difference here is when a new USPA AFF instructor qualifies in the USA they spend years working with very experienced Instructors before being let loose on students without supervision. However when a new USPA AFF instructor qualifies outside of the USA they have no such system and these are the ones that are bringing the sport into disrepute. Having qualified on both systems and worked with Instructors from both systems I know that I would not hesitate to recommend any BPA qualified AFF or Tandem Instructor. There are a few British jumpers who are now qualified as USPA Instructors purely because they have not passed the British Course. This should be a concern to you, so make sure you check out your Instructors carefully. Finally there are a growing number of websites that state “Learn to skydive with British Instructors” Although they are British and Instructors they are not British Qualified Instructors. This should be a red flag to anyone as it means they are trying to gain respect and credibility by associating themselves with a reputable organisation that they are not qualified through. Some similar quotes used to gain credibility are as follows: • Skydiving company run by Brits and owned by Brits They will even have a link to the British Parachute Association web site to help gain credibility, all these quotes are ones that are currently being used on web sites and they sound very good, unless like me you get to know who they really are and what each statement really means. Skydiving Company run by Brits and owned by Brits just means that they are from Britain; it does not mean that they are British qualified; it does not even mean they have a legitimate company. Our syllabus has been approved by British Chief Instructors from UK drop zones. It’s a nice statement but they don’t say who these so called chief instructors are and how they are qualified to approve a skydiving syllabus. One of Europe’s leading skydiving schools, what a classic statement, the only ones who say this are the newest schools on the market with very little experience, ask your self, how can they justify a statement like this. We have trained thousands of Students; again the only ones that I have found that state this are the new schools who have not been qualified long enough to have taught more than a small handful of students. One especially only completed his AFF course as a student in March 2004 now he is claiming to be an experienced AFF Instructor having taught thousands of students. Sorry this is not physically possible We follow the BPA guide lines, anyone can say this but the truth is very simple they don’t and they don’t have to as they are not regulated by the BPA Chief Instructor has 4,000 skydives. The last time I read this the Instructor in question only had 900 jumps and had just recently qualified as an Instructor so what an exaggerated statement this was. The only proof is a BPA certified certificate, all those I found that were not true had less than 1,000 jumps. Other statement like our Instructors have on average over 5,000 jumps, dont believe general quotes, see the facts.. Other methods of showing credibility are statements like British Gold medal holders, sounds great but in reality all it means is that they have entered a competition that requires no more than 100 jumps and that they have beaten other with the same jump numbers. This really does not mean they are of a high standard unless they have won a senior skydiving competition at national level. Other statements such as specialist in film stunts are used to show credibility, once again a nice statement but most of those I have found are not true. Ask for proof. The best credibility statement I have seen is “USPA safety and training advisor” what a great statement but the reality is that a new Instructor with 400 jumps can ask the USPA for this title and if they don’t have any one in that region with this title they will issue it to the instructor. Basically in the USA this title means quite a lot but outside of the USA it means nothing more than an administration qualification that is extremely easy to get. Unfortunately in most cases outside of the USA this is being used to gain credibility that is not deserved. Some companies don’t even use AFF Instructors to do the ground school; this is because the USA system allows a coach with only 150 jumps to teach the ground school training, this would never be allowed in the UK and thefore is something that is a big concern to most British Instructors. To summarise you have to check each statement, read all about your Instructors qualification then ask for proof don’t accept general quotes. Rigging BPA Advanced Packer I found one web site stating that one of the Instructors is also the chief rigger; the person in question had no riggers ratings at all so his statement is a total fabrication of the truth. One statement that I found is as follows: Our parachute equipment is maintained to UK standards by our in house manager, this means nothing apart from saying that they don’t have a qualified BPA rigger maintaining there equipment Your equipment maintenance is vital, Once again check with the BPA for verification Credibility Make sure you get proof of how long they have been established and how long they have been in the location that they work from. The way that one man organisations gain credibility is by listing lots of staff members on their web site, the reality is that the extra staff they list do not work for them, but are available and work for the drop zone that they are temporarily associated with. One of the biggest ways to gain credibility is to have a list of students who give a testimonial of how good the course was, this is great and any good company will have this available. What I have noticed is those companies that are dodgy seem to have more testimonials than anyone could possibly get without having the pressure being put on them, for example one school will not give students their documentation until they have filled out a customer response form. This means the student has to be nice and is not doing it willingly and once the company has the statement they have nothing more to do with the student and after care is no longer a concern. My experience of teaching AFF students since 1994 is that only a small handful of students write in with lengthy testimonial, the majority stay friends, keep in touch and come back, others move on and settle in a local drop zone, but the majority don’t write detailed testimonials like some you see in web sites. Ask yourself one question would you have done the same. I get lots of e-mails saying thanks and hope to see you again which is very genuine and the normal response. Another way to gain credibility is to list all the available skydiving courses even if they cant teach them, they then book you in with a qualified Instructor and take a commission so make sure you know who your Instructor really is. BPA Qualifications and licenses You will read statements like “after your course we will guide you into the British system by giving you the forms to apply for a license” Don’t accept this offer, it means that firstly you did a course outside of the BPA system and were thefore not insured and secondly that they can not give you the qualification that you are paying for or expect to get. Facilities Today's skydiving student rarely gets injured, however when they do its always when landing and making last minute decisions trying to avoid a tree, fence or even buildings. The best way to prevent this is not to be put in this situation in the first place, so a large safe landing area is important. As a student however you will not know what is safe or unsafe so here are a few guide lines, the size should be a minimum of 1,000sq ft ideally 2,000sq ft with no obstacles in that area, it should also be surrounded by large open fields that you can safely land in if you miss the planned landing area. It should be clear of power lines, water hazards, main roads, towns etc. Believe me, when you get it wrong you will be glad you chose a drop zone with these safety margins. Weather Independently Check out the normal wind and weather conditions for the location and period you are planning for your skydiving holiday. Skydiving Packages The travelling industry is very well regulated and you have to book your own travelling arrangements Also when you turn up at your accommodation to find its not fully paid for only to be told by the skydiving company, sorry the hotel have changed there prices. Operating Procedure The rules of sport have often been designed or adapted with safety in
mind. Boxing referees stop fights sooner these days, the rules of rugby
have been changed to reduce neck injuries in scrums, referees are strict
about dangerous tackles, and parachute associations investigate every
incident to educate skydivers, instructors and riggers to prevent the
same mistake from re-occurring. If the drop zone is not a BPA member then the chances are that they don’t
work to any recognised safety system, each jumper is responsible for looking
after them selves, good Instructors however would normally look after
you while you are on student status. Check out our "How to avoid becoming a statistic" fact sheet, this is more relevent after you have qualified as a solo skydiver but a must read for the safety conscious skydiver. Survival Skills The Internet is a great source of information unfortunately it also makes it easy for those dodgy characters to tell lies and influence potential customers with good marketing web sites. Make sure you check them out before booking your Skydiving Course. Allan Hewitt My qualifications are listed below and proof can be varified here, however if you have any further questions you can contact myself or either the BPA (British parachute Association) or the USPA (United States Parachute Association) for further proof. BPA Parachute Instructor Since 1990 with 4,000 + Jumps Click below to go straight to the next, safety fact sheet |
||
Sky Science |
|